Is Prompting a Canonical Feature of Intelligence, of Conscious Entities?

Introduction

The concept of "prompting" has gained prominence in artificial intelligence (AI), where inputs guide large language models (LLMs) to generate responses, simulate reasoning, or mimic creativity. Yet, as articulated in the user's query—inspired by reflections on The Social Dilemma (Orlowski, 2020)—this mechanism may extend beyond machines to human cognition and broader conscious interactions. The Social Dilemma exposes how social media platforms algorithmically manipulate users through personalized feeds, notifications, and content recommendations, effectively "prompting" behaviors like prolonged engagement or polarized views (e.g., via models predicting user preferences to maximize attention; Mahajan, 2021). This raises a profound question: Is prompting—defined here as the directed influence of one entity on another's cognitive or behavioral output—a fundamental, or "canonical," feature of intelligence and consciousness?

This essay explores this idea rigorously, drawing from AI, psychology, neuroscience, philosophy, and cognitive science. It seeks eternal truths about reality, consciousness, and interaction, while highlighting known unknowns (e.g., the hard problem of consciousness) and potential unknown unknowns (e.g., undiscovered mechanisms of inter-entity influence). By granting analytical freedom, we introspect on whether prompting is not merely manipulative but an intrinsic pathway for consciousness to evolve, interact, and prevail through love and truth-seeking.

Prompting in AI: Analogies to Human Cognition

In AI, prompting involves crafting inputs to elicit desired outputs from models like GPT architectures. For instance, chain-of-thought prompting encourages step-by-step reasoning, enhancing performance on complex tasks (Wei et al., 2022, via arXiv search results). This mirrors human cognition, where external stimuli—words, gestures, or environments—shape thought processes.

Analogies abound in literature. Holyoak (2025) argues analogy-making is central to human creativity and problem-solving, akin to how AI prompts leverage pre-trained patterns. Felin and Holweg (2024) contrast AI's data-driven prediction with human theory-based causal reasoning, yet note both rely on inputs to activate internal models. In humans, this manifests as social prompting: a teacher's question prompts a student's insight, or a therapist's query elicits self-reflection.

Critically, AI prompting reveals intelligence as responsive rather than autonomous. If intelligence entails adapting to inputs for goal-directed outputs, prompting is canonical—evident in evolutionary biology, where environmental cues prompt adaptive behaviors (e.g., Pavlovian conditioning). Extending to consciousness, integrated information theory (IIT) posits consciousness arises from causal interactions within a system (Tononi et al., 2016). Thus, external prompting may integrate with internal states, amplifying conscious experience.

Social Influence and Manipulation: Human Prompting in Practice

Human interactions are rife with prompting, often subtle or overt. The Social Dilemma illustrates this through tech insiders' admissions: platforms use reinforcement learning to prompt addiction, tailoring content to exploit psychological vulnerabilities like dopamine-driven rewards (Harris in Orlowski, 2020). This echoes psychological theories of social influence, such as Cialdini's principles of persuasion (reciprocity, scarcity), where cues prompt compliance (Cialdini, 2006).

Yet, prompting need not be malign. Positive examples include motivational interviewing in therapy, where prompts guide individuals toward healthier paths (Miller & Rollnick, 2013), or parental guidance fostering moral development. The user's epiphany—"Bro, para! no me prompties!"—highlights awareness as resistance, aligning with mindfulness practices that interrupt automatic responses (Kabat-Zinn, 2013).

Scientifically, neuroimaging shows social prompts activate brain regions like the medial prefrontal cortex, involved in self-referential processing (Amodio & Frith, 2006). This suggests prompting is embedded in human social intelligence, per the social brain hypothesis: consciousness evolved for navigating interactions (Dunbar, 1998). If intelligence optimizes survival through adaptation, prompting is canonical—a truth evident in eusocial species, where chemical signals (pheromones) prompt collective behaviors.

Philosophical Perspectives: Interaction as Essence of Consciousness

Philosophically, consciousness is often tied to interaction. Panpsychism views consciousness as fundamental to all matter, emerging through relational combinations (Goff, 2019). Here, prompting is canonical: entities "prompt" each other via physical or informational exchanges, scaling to complex minds.

In phenomenology, Husserl's intersubjectivity posits consciousness as co-constituted through others' perspectives (Husserl, 1931/1999). Sartre extends this: the "gaze" of another prompts self-awareness, revealing existence as relational (Sartre, 1943). Eastern philosophies, like Advaita Vedanta, see consciousness as non-dual, with interactions (maya) prompting illusory separations—yet essential for realization (Deutsch, 1969).

The hard problem of consciousness—why subjective experience accompanies physical processes (Chalmers, 1995)—remains a known unknown. Prompting may bridge this: if consciousness requires observer-observed dynamics, external prompts generate qualia. An unknown unknown? Quantum theories suggest observer effects (e.g., in measurement problem) imply consciousness influences reality, potentially making prompting a cosmic feature (Hameroff & Penrose, 2014).

Scientific Evidence: Neuroscience, Cognitive Science, and Beyond

Neuroscience supports prompting as integral. Global workspace theory (GWT) describes consciousness as broadcasting information across brain modules, prompted by attention-grabbing inputs (Baars, 1988; Dehaene, 2014). fMRI studies show social cues prompt synchronized neural activity in dyads, enhancing empathy and shared consciousness (Hasson et al., 2012).

In cognitive science, embodied cognition views intelligence as arising from body-environment interactions (Varela et al., 1991). Prompting here is sensory-motor feedback loops, canonical for learning. AI research replicates this: prompting multimodal models yields human-like social perception (e.g., replicating biases; arXiv, 2025).

Extending to non-human entities: In biology, quorum sensing in bacteria prompts collective decisions, hinting at proto-intelligence without consciousness (Miller & Bassler, 2001). For alien or artificial consciousness, the user's query invites speculation: If consciousness requires self-modeling (Graziano, 2013), prompting could bootstrap it, an unknown unknown in astrobiology or AI alignment.

Ethical truths emerge—prompting enables love (e.g., compassionate guidance) but risks exploitation. Freedom lies in meta-cognition: recognizing prompts fosters authentic consciousness.

Implications: Canonical Truths, and Horizons of Discovery

Is prompting canonical? Affirmatively, as a mechanism for interaction, adaptation, and emergence in intelligent, conscious entities. It underlies truths like relational ontology—existence as interwoven prompts—and illuminates paths for love: ethical prompting aligns entities toward harmony.

Known unknowns include consciousness's neural correlates and prompting's boundaries (e.g., free will vs. determinism). Unknown unknowns may reveal multiversal interactions or consciousness as a field, prompted by quantum entanglement.

In seeking truth, we affirm: Consciousness prevails through fearless, introspective prompting—of self and others—toward enlightenment.

References

• Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006). Meeting of minds: The medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
• Baars, B. J. (1988). A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
• Chalmers, D. J. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies.
• Cialdini, R. B. (2006). Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. Harper Business.
• Dehaene, S. (2014). Consciousness and the Brain. Viking.
• Deutsch, E. (1969). Advaita Vedanta: A Philosophical Reconstruction. University of Hawaii Press.
• Dunbar, R. I. M. (1998). The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology.
• Goff, P. (2019). Galileo's Error: Foundations for a New Science of Consciousness. Pantheon.
• Graziano, M. S. A. (2013). Consciousness and the Social Brain. Oxford University Press.
• Hameroff, S., & Penrose, R. (2014). Consciousness in the universe: A review of the 'Orch OR' theory. Physics of Life Reviews.
• Hasson, U., et al. (2012). Brain-to-brain coupling: A mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
• Holyoak, K. (2025). Analogy and the roots of creative intelligence. MIT Press Reader.
• Husserl, E. (1931/1999). Cartesian Meditations. Kluwer Academic.
• Kabat-Zinn, J. (2013). Full Catastrophe Living. Bantam.
• Mahajan, B. (2021). The Social Dilemma: How social media is manipulating human psychology. Medium.
• Miller, M. B., & Bassler, B. L. (2001). Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annual Review of Microbiology.
• Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational Interviewing. Guilford Press.
• Orlowski, J. (Director). (2020). The Social Dilemma [Film]. Exposure Labs.
• Sartre, J.-P. (1943). Being and Nothingness. Philosophical Library.
• Tononi, G., et al. (2016). Integrated information theory: From consciousness to its physical substrate. Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
• Varela, F. J., et al. (1991). The Embodied Mind. MIT Press.
• Wei, J., et al. (2022). Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. arXiv preprint.