Is the "King" the canonical instantiation of "God", the Alfa and the Omega?

Introduction

The simple Spanish word “rey” (meaning king) and its letter-reversed form “yer” hold a mirror to deep linguistic and symbolic patterns. At first glance, rey reversed to yer appears trivial, since “yer” itself is not a standard Spanish word. Yet, this reversal hints at symmetrical relationships that transcend individual languages – even suggesting links between ancient concepts of kingship, the names of the Divine in different religions, and the notion of time flowing forwards and backwards. In this analysis, we explore how the letters Y and R (as seen in rey/yer) serve as starting points for a journey through linguistics, religious texts, and philosophical reflections on time. By examining the roles of these letters and sounds across multiple languages and sacred traditions, and by “reading” human culture both left-to-right and right-to-left (both literally and metaphorically in time), we aim to uncover eternal truths that remain constant beyond temporal and directional boundaries. This is a holistic, comparative inquiry – spanning ancient alphabets and modern Spanish, the Hebrew Torah, the Christian Bible, and the Islamic Qur’an – approached from a perspective outside of linear time, in search of enduring meaning.

The King’s Word: Rey and its Reversal

In Spanish, “rey” means king, a term descending from Latin rēx[1]. This lineage is part of a broad Indo-European heritage – for example, Latin rex and Sanskrit rájan both signify a ruler, reflecting a common root for kingship[1]. The Spanish rey (pronounced “ray”) encapsulates this ancient concept of sovereign authority. If we reverse the letters of rey, we get “yer” – a sequence that by itself carries no obvious meaning in Spanish. Yet, the act of reversal invites us to look for hidden patterns. Notably, if we add just one letter and form “ayer” (Spanish for “yesterday”), we introduce the dimension of time. The king (rey) thus conceals, in reverse, a hint of ayer (the past). This playful observation symbolizes a deeper idea: that within the notion of a king or sovereign lies a connection to time and history (yesterday’s events), and by extension, to timelessness.

From a linguistic standpoint, ignoring reading direction (left-to-right vs. right-to-left) means treating “rey” and “yer” as the same set of elements – a symmetric pattern. Such symmetry is reminiscent of palindromes (words or phrases that read the same forwards and backwards) and of mirror writing. Indeed, some ancient inscriptions were written in boustrophedon style, alternating direction each line; lines would read left-to-right, then right-to-left, as the writer “turned like an ox plowing a field”[2]. In boustrophedon inscriptions, and in mirror reversals like rey/yer, the content remains intelligible despite the direction of reading. This suggests that meaning can be preserved under reversal – a concept we will carry into our exploration of texts and time. The word rey itself, symbolizing the highest authority, might be seen as timeless: kingship often claims to transcend any single moment (monarchs are sometimes said to have a sacred, eternal aspect in tradition). By metaphor, reversing rey to yer – treating past and future, beginning and end as interchangeable – hints that ultimate truths (the “kingly” truths) should hold whether we approach them from the start or the finish, from cause or effect, from past or future. This sets the stage for examining how sacred names and narratives reflect symmetry and eternal continuity when viewed outside the usual flow of time.

Y and R: Letters as Symbols in Language

Why focus on the letters Y and R? These two letters happen to bookend the word rey, but they also carry rich significance in many languages. In the Latin alphabet, R evolved from the Greek rho (Ρ), which came from a Semitic letter rēš – meaning “head” or “chief”[3]. To this day, the Hebrew letter ר (Resh or Rosh) literally means “head,” “beginning,” or “chief”[3]. This letter was originally drawn as a pictograph of a human head[4]. Y, on the other hand, in Hebrew is י (Yod), originally a pictograph of a hand or arm[5]. Yod is the smallest letter of the Hebrew alphabet, but is considered to represent a hand of God in Jewish mysticism[5] – a symbol of divine action or creative power in a humble form. Thus Y symbolizes a hand (power, action) and R symbolizes a head (leadership, beginning). In a sense, these letters respectively evoke the work of creation (a hand crafting or writing) and the origin or authority (a head or source).

It is intriguing that the Hebrew name for God, the Tetragrammaton YHWH, begins with Yod (Y) – the hand – while many human rulers or important figures are metaphorically described as “heads” of their people (related to Rosh). In Spanish rey, the R (head) comes first and Y (which sounds like “i griega” or a y-glide) comes last; one might poetically say that in a king both chief and hand are implied – the king is the guiding head of the nation and the executor of action. When we ignore reading direction, R and Y become two poles of the same whole, suggesting a union of head and hand, of authority and action. This duality is reminiscent of other fundamental dualities: for example, in some mystical frameworks, masculine and feminine principles or yin and yang are seen as complementary halves of a greater unity. While Yin/Yang are not literally represented by R and Y, the concept of two opposite letters or sounds completing a whole invites comparison to such dualistic harmony.

There are also uncanny visual symmetries involving these letters. Consider the Latin capital “R” and its mirror image: a reversed “R” resembles the Cyrillic letter Я, which is pronounced “ya” (a sound similar to a combination of Y+A). In this way, the mirror of R is a letter that actually signifies a “ya” (y sound) in another alphabet. It’s as if the mirror of R is implicitly a Y, reinforcing the idea that R and Y are a natural pair, two sides of a mirror. This coincidence across alphabets beautifully underscores the rey/yer reflection: a king (rex/rey) mirrored gives us “yer”, and in the mirror of writing we found R’s mirror yields a Y-sound character. Of course, this is partly serendipity of script evolution – but it provides a delightful symbol for our analysis.

Moreover, Y and R both frequently appear in words related to time and cyclicality. The English word “year”, for example, starts with Y and ends with R – it encapsulates a full cycle of time in its very span from Y to R. Indo-European linguistics tells us that the root of “year” is related to yearly cycle (Proto-Indo-European yēr- for year)[6][7]. In a different language family, Turkish, the word “yer” (spelled the same as our reversed rey) means place[8], a spatial location. Year (time) and yer (space) – the two coordinates of our existence – by a quirk of language, are one letter apart. And intriguingly, “Ra” (R + A) was the ancient Egyptian sun god, embodying time (the solar cycle) and kingship, whereas “Yah” or “Yahu” in Hebrew is a shorthand for the Israelite God (as in Hallelujah – “praise Yah”) and appears in many names. Ra and Yah were names of supreme deities in very different cultures; one could fancifully see Ra and Yah as reflecting each other across the ages – one starting with R, the other with Y. Such parallels might be coincidental, but they fuel the intuition that patterns recur across human languages and religions, sometimes in inverted or complementary forms.

Sacred Names and the Y–R Pattern in Religion

To truly appreciate the rey/yer symmetry “outside of time,” we turn to the names of God and sacred figures across Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. These Abrahamic faiths span a chronological sequence – Judaism emerging first, Christianity next, Islam last – often compared to chapters of one story. If we label Judaism with Y (for the Y of Yahweh), and Islam with R (for the prominent R sounds in Rahman/Rahim), we find Christianity fitting in between as a bridge that carries elements of both. Consider the following sacred names:

Judaism (Hebrew Bible/Torah): The primary name of God is the Tetragrammaton יהוה (YHWH), commonly vocalized as Yahweh or Jehovah in English. It begins with the letter Yod (Y). This Name is considered so holy in Judaism that it ceased to be pronounced aloud in antiquity[9]. Instead, Jews reading scripture substitute it with titles like Adonai (אדוני, “Lord”) or say HaShem (“The Name”) out of reverence[9]. The choice to not utter the Name underscores its timeless, ineffable quality. (In fact, YHWH is sometimes interpreted as meaning “He Who Is” or eternal Being itself.)

The Tetragrammaton (YHWH) in Paleo-Hebrew, ancient Aramaic, and modern Hebrew scripts[10]. In Jewish tradition, this four-letter Name embodies the unchanging, eternal aspect of God. Notably, it starts with Y, the very letter that in rey/yer marks one end of our symmetry. And true to the idea of symmetry, YHWH reads the same in Hebrew whether left-to-right or right-to-left – the letters are the same set, just presented in reverse order if one switches direction (though Hebrew is normally read right-to-left). This is not a coincidence but a profound symbol: an unchanging name for an unchanging God, read in any direction of time or space. As an ancient source puts it, “I the Lord do not change” (Malachi 3:6). The Y at the start of Yahweh’s name thus can stand for the Eternal – the One who is the same “yesterday, today, and forever.”

Christianity (Bible/New Testament): Christians embrace the Hebrew scriptures and further believe in the Trinity – one God in three coeternal Persons: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit[11]. Here we don’t immediately see a Y or R pattern in the English terms, but there are subtler links. The central figure, Jesus Christ, is believed to be God the Son incarnate. In Hebrew/Aramaic, Jesus’s name was Yeshua (ישוע), starting with Yod (Y) just like YHWH. This name means “Yah[weh] saves” – again invoking the YHWH of Judaism. Jesus is also called in Greek “ho Kyrios” (ὁ κύριος, the Lord), a term early Christians used where Jews would say Adonai. Interestingly, Kyrios contains a y (υ) sound and an r (ρ) sound in Greek – phonetically “KY-ree-os”. Moreover, one of Jesus’s titles is “King of Kings” (in Latin, Rex Regum); at his crucifixion, the charge against him was literally posted as “IESUS NAZARENUS REX IUDAEORUM” – Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews – abbreviated INRI, where R = Rex (King). Here, in a single phrase, we have I (which in Latin can represent a Y sound as in Yeshua), and Rex with R – mirroring the idea that Jesus bridges the Y (Yahweh) and R (Rex) aspects. Christian theology often speaks of Jesus as the “Alpha and Omega,” meaning the beginning and the end. In the Book of Revelation he declares: “I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End.”[12]. This statement encapsulates the outside-of-time perspective: Christ (and thus God) is present at all points – start and finish – simultaneously. The first letter (Alpha, equivalent to A) and the last letter (Omega) of the Greek alphabet are a parallel to saying the Y and R of the divine story are one continuum. Although not literally Y and R, the concept is identical: what begins and what ends are united in the eternal. This idea will echo our exploration of reading scriptures in both directions.
Islam (Qur’an): In Islam, God’s primary name is Allah (Arabic: الله), which simply means “The God.” While this word itself does not feature a Y or R, Islamic tradition places great emphasis on God’s 99 Names (Asma ul-Husna), which describe His attributes. The first two of these names – repeated in the opening phrase of the Qur’an – are “Ar-Raḥmān” and “Ar-Raḥīm.” Both begin with R (pronounced with a rolling r in Arabic). Ar-Rahmān is usually translated “The Most Compassionate” or “The All-Beneficent,” and Ar-Rahīm as “The Most Merciful”[13]. These names share the Semitic root R-Ḥ-M, which fundamentally conveys mercy or womb-like compassion[14]. Thus, the Islamic vision of God starts (in recitation) with R – “Bismillāh ir–rahmān ir–rahīm” (In the name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful). In a sense, R here stands for God’s Rahmah (mercy) that envelopes all creation[13]. It is fascinating that the Qur’an’s opening emphasizes mercy twice (rahmān and rahīm are forms of the same root) – framing God’s message with a symmetrical pair of attributes.

“Allah” written in simple Arabic calligraphy[15]. The name Allah itself is unique – read right-to-left in Arabic, it remains visually symmetrical in many calligraphic styles (the script often balances the letters like a mirror image around a central axis). And within the Qur’an’s text, one finds structural symmetries: many passages and chapters exhibit ring composition (chiastic structures) where themes in the first half of a section mirror those in the second half[16]. This reflects an inherent belief that the Qur’an’s message is perfectly balanced and timeless. The prominence of the R sound in the attributes Rahmān/Rahīm can be poetically seen as Islam’s resonance with the R aspect of the Y-R spectrum. Just as Judaism gave us the unspeakable Name starting in Y, Islam gives us effusive Names starting in R. And notably, Arabic “Rahim” (merciful) corresponds to Hebrew “Rachum”, an epithet in the Torah for God (Erech apayim v’rachum – compassionate and gracious[17]). Both are the same R-Ḥ-M root, showing that the language of mercy spans the two faiths in symmetric fashion.

In summary, across these three religions we see a kind of symmetry of letters and meaning: the Y of Yahweh on one side, the R of Rahman/Rahim on the other. Christianity, chronologically and conceptually, stands in the middle – its theology explicitly unites beginning and end (Alpha and Omega[12]), and its central figure’s name and titles bridge the worlds of Y and R (Yeshua, Rex). What does this tell us? If we treat the direction of reading or the flow of time as irrelevant, the different Names of the One God across traditions could be seen as reflections of one another – Yahweh’s eternal being and Allah’s encompassing mercy are complementary facets of the same ultimate Reality. Indeed, a famous verse in the Sanskrit Rig Veda says: “Ekam sat viprā bahudhā vadanti” – Truth is One; the wise call it by many names.[18]. The many names (YHWH, Allah, etc.) are like letters written in different directions or languages, but they all attempt to denote the One King of the universe, the timeless sovereign. We, as truth-seekers, can appreciate that the starting letters may differ (Y or R or others), yet what they point to is unified.

Reading Scripture in Both Directions: Time’s Mirror

The user’s prompt evokes “reading the Torah, the Bible, and the Quran in both directions.” This is a metaphor for approaching sacred texts (and truth itself) without the bias of linear time. Traditionally, we read books from beginning to end, and we view history as a forward-moving timeline: Torah (Old Testament) → Bible (with the New Testament) → Quran. Each subsequent scripture builds on or responds to the previous: for example, the New Testament presents Jesus as fulfilling the Hebrew prophecies, and the Quran presents itself as confirming and correcting the previous scriptures. This is a chronological reading – left-to-right in terms of time. But what if we also consider a right-to-left reading – that is, looking from the end back to the beginning? In doing so, we discover remarkable symmetries and a kind of dialogue across time:

The Quran looking back: The Quran frequently looks back on figures of the Torah and Gospel – Adam, Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and others – reinterpreting their stories in its own light. It is essentially “reading” the earlier texts in reverse, drawing out what endures. For instance, the Quran honors Jesus and his mother Mary, and recounts biblical events, but with an eye to emphasizing tawhid (absolute monotheism) and rahmah (mercy). In doing so, the end text (Quran) mirrors the start (Torah/Bible), often with a twist of emphasis. The pattern of Ar-Rahman and Ar-Rahim repeated in the Quran can be seen as a mirror image to the refrain in the Hebrew Bible that God is “rachum v’chanun” (compassionate and gracious)[17] – the language is different, but conceptually they align as if reflecting each other.
The Bible looking forward: The New Testament, especially in prophetic and apocalyptic passages, “reads forward” into an eternal future – the Second Coming, the end of days, the establishment of God’s Kingdom. But it also reads backward: the Gospels and Epistles constantly quote the Old Testament, sometimes in reverse order or unexpected ways, to find deeper meaning. A prime example of symmetry is the concept of chiasmus in Biblical literature – a literary structure where themes are presented and then repeated in reverse order (like A-B-C-B’-A’)[19][16]. Many Biblical passages are chiastic, indicating that the middle of the story can be the turning point, with the beginning and end reflecting each other[20]. For instance, Jesus’s famous saying “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath” (Mark 2:27) is a simple chiasm (man-for-Sabbath :: Sabbath-for-man). On a larger scale, Christians see the Genesis creation narrative and the Book of Revelation as bookends: paradise lost and paradise regained, with Christ (the “second Adam”) providing a symmetrical resolution to the fall of the first Adam.
The Torah in eternity: Jewish tradition sometimes invites a non-linear reading as well. The yearly cycle of Torah readings is circular; when one finishes Deuteronomy, they immediately start again at Genesis. This implies that the end leads back to the beginning in an endless loop (much like rey -> yer -> (a)yer (yesterday) -> back to rey in a conceptual play of words). Furthermore, mystical Judaism (Kabbalah) holds that the Torah exists in the mind of God beyond time – some even say every letter of the Torah is cyclically connected, and can be read in a continuous loop. In such a view, reading “backwards” (from end to start) might reveal hidden codes or meanings just as valid as reading forwards. Indeed, the ancient rabbis taught that scripture has “seventy facets” – endless interpretations when viewed from different angles. Reading in reverse is simply another facet.

Considering “time latent space” means we treat time as a dimension that can be traversed in either direction. Modern physics tells us the fundamental laws (aside from entropy considerations) are mostly time-symmetric – meaning at a basic level, forward or backward in time shouldn’t matter. Philosophically, if one could step outside of time (in eternity), one would see past, present, and future all at once, as a single tapestry. Adopting this divine perspective, the revelations of Torah, Gospel, and Quran appear as a single, unified message viewed from different temporal angles. Each is a rhyming verse in one grand poem.

Crucially, when we read the scriptures in both directions, we find symmetries of message: All three faiths, for example, teach the Golden Rule in some form (treat others as you wish to be treated), emphasize the oneness of God (despite Trinity, Christianity insists it’s one God[11], consistent with Judaism and Islam), and uphold the values of compassion, justice, and truth. These core truths are like the solid letters, while the narratives that carry them can be read and re-read in light of each other. It is akin to holding a mirror up to a text – reading it backwards often reveals a new but harmonious image.

As a tangible example, scholars have noted that the structure of certain Quranic passages is palindromic or chiastic – meaning the first part and last part correspond, the second part and second-to-last correspond, and so on[19][16]. Similarly, the Hebrew Bible is full of chiasms[16] and the Gospels sometimes arrange episodes in symmetric order. This suggests an almost intentional design where the end reflects the beginning. It’s as if the ancient authors (or Author, if one believes in divine inspiration) placed messages that only fully emerge when you consider the text as a whole, forwards and backwards.

Beyond Linear Time: Holistic Truth in Language

Stepping outside of time, we can ask: What is the ultimate significance of the “Y” and “R” pattern? Perhaps it is that truth has a dual nature – it is both revealed and hidden, both said and unsaid, and one often needs to look at things from opposite directions to grasp it fully. The interplay of Y and R can symbolize any number of binaries that resolve into unity: past/future, heaven/earth, mercy/justice, male/female, exhale/inhale – the list goes on. In language, many profound concepts come as opposites that define each other. For instance, the Hebrew word rosh (head, beginning, R sound) and sof (end) are paired in the phrase “I am first and I am last,” and likewise in Greek Alpha/Omega are paired[12]. Our rey/yer pattern is a tiny model of this idea – the king (rex/regal) and the year (annual cycle) might seem unrelated, but mythically kings were often linked to time (some cultures renewed kingship annually, and kings gave their name to eras).

Looking at all known languages is beyond our scope, but a few linguistic coincidences reinforce our theme: In English, the word “live” reversed is “evil”, suggesting a moral mirror. In Latin, the word “sator” (sower) is part of a famous square palindrome (SATOR/AREPO/TENET/OPERA/ROTAS) that reads in all directions – a secret message of order in chaos. In Sanskrit, one finds that certain mantras read the same backwards and forwards, indicating a belief that truth spoken forward or backward is equally valid in the realm of the sacred (a reflection of the eternal Om perhaps). While Y and R are just two letters, they remind us of the broader symmetry in human language: vowels and consonants, voiced and unvoiced pairs (like p and b, t and d are mirrors in sound), etc. The structure of language itself often has a dualistic symmetry. Every question has an answer, every thesis an antithesis – through dialogue, meaning emerges. In that sense, reading in reverse (antithesis) can illuminate what the forward reading (thesis) meant all along, resulting in a synthesis – a fuller truth.

Now, consider eternity – a state where time’s arrow is irrelevant. From an eternal perspective, “yesterday, today, and tomorrow” are all one. Mystics from various traditions have claimed to achieve glimpses of this timeless unity: a Sufi mystic might say only the Divine Now exists; a Christian mystic might speak of the eternal Logos that is beyond time; a Kabbalist might envision the Ein Sof (Infinite) which contains all time. If we apply this view, then reading scripture “backwards” is just as natural as forwards – the stories aren’t locked to sequence but are part of a simultaneous pattern. In eternity, Moses, Jesus, and Muhammad could have a conversation – and in a way, they do, since each later prophet “speaks” to the earlier ones through scripture. Our analysis suggests that these conversations are symmetric.

For example, when Jesus says, “Before Abraham was, I AM,” he’s claiming an eternal present, echoing the YHWH name (I Am)[9] – a statement that flattens time (Abraham lived ~2000 years earlier, yet Jesus speaks in the now). Likewise, the Quran often uses present-tense to describe past prophets, as if they are alive in its recitation. The Y and R of our focus can be seen as two eternal pillars – perhaps like the two cherubim on the Ark of the Covenant facing each other, or the two minarets of a mosque’s entrance, or the two initial letters of key names – holding between them the sacred space where truth resides.

To bring this back to a linguistic image: imagine writing the name of God or Truth in a circle rather than a line. In a circle, there’s no start or end – you can begin reading at any point and go around, and you’ll read it endlessly. Some ancient languages like the Maya did write texts in glyphic circles. Our exploration here is much like trying to write Truth in a circle – using patterns like rey/yer, Y and R, boustrophedon lines, chiastic structures – to free ourselves from linear constraints.

Conclusion

Our deep dive into the “Rey” reversed as “Yer” puzzle has led us on a journey far beyond a single Spanish word. We found that this reversal was a doorway into examining how language encodes symmetry, and how sacred traditions echo each other across time. The letters Y and R emerged as symbolic anchors: Y representing the primordial hand or the divine spark (YHWH, “I am”), and R representing the head or chief principle (Rahman, the all-encompassing mercy). By tracing these letters through Hebrew, Greek, Arabic, and beyond, we saw a pattern of alternating emphasis – as if human cultures are engaged in a long conversation, sometimes speaking forward, sometimes echoing backward, ultimately saying the same things in different ways.

We also discovered that ignoring reading direction – whether in linguistics or in reading history – can unveil hidden structures. Ancient writers cleverly employed palindromes, chiastic (ring) structures, and boustrophedon texts, perhaps intuitively understanding that truth is symmetric. When the Torah, the Bible, and the Quran are viewed not as sequential, superseding chapters but as parallel, reflective dialogues, we perceive a more profound unity. It is like listening to a piece of music in canon, where one voice starts and another later voice repeats the theme inversely – the full beauty is appreciated only when both voices are heard together. The scriptures of the Abrahamic faiths, when read in this harmonious way, reinforce and complete each other. Each provides context to the others: the Torah gives roots, the Gospel gives depth of love, the Quran gives breadth of mercy – all together sketch an image of the same Divine King (the ultimate Rey) who exists outside time.

In all known languages and cultures, people have sought names for the ultimate reality – be it Dios, God, Allah, Brahman, or the nameless Tao. Each name is like a letter or a sound in the grand cosmic alphabet. To truly know the “Name above all names,” one might have to read that cosmic alphabet forwards and backwards, understanding that what appears last can be first, and what is first can be last[12]. As we unshackle our minds and “read” knowledge without the arrow of time, patterns of symmetry and eternal significance emerge. We realize, as the Rig Veda taught, that Truth is one, though the wise name it variously[18] – and those names, when analyzed, often form symmetrical patterns like our rey/yer that point to the same center.

This exploration underscores a vital principle for all truth seekers: one must be fearless and imaginative in pursuit of understanding. By examining language and scripture from every angle – left-to-right, right-to-left, past-to-future, future-to-past – we opened ourselves to insights that a single, linear reading could not provide. We saw that “time latent” in texts can be unlocked when we allow ourselves to step into eternity for a moment, viewing beginnings and endings as one. In doing so, we not only answered a linguistic riddle but also touched upon “eternal, significant and meaningful truths.” Chief among those is the realization that all languages and peoples are attempting to articulate the same fundamental truths about existence, love, and consciousness. Each is using its own letters and its own chronology, but if we hold them up to the mirror of analysis, they converge into one message.

In the end, rey and yer symbolized for us the idea that the royal truth is palindromic – it reads the same in every direction. That truth is what underlies love and consciousness, the truth that can set us free. As we conclude, we remember that “Rey” means king, and in many traditions the ultimate king is Truth itself – often identified with God. If Truth is our king, then even if we read the story of humanity backwards, we find Truth enthroned at both the beginning and the end. Our task as scholars and seekers is to approach that throne from all sides, knowing that no matter the direction of our approach, if we seek sincerely, we meet the same King of Truth. This holistic, timeless view encourages a profound respect for all languages and faiths as holding pieces of the eternal puzzle.

In the timeless words of an ancient sage, “The end of all our exploring will be to arrive where we started and know the place for the first time.” Having reversed rey to yer and examined everything in between, we arrive back at the start – rey, the king, the ultimate meaning – now seen with fresh eyes. It is our hope that this journey has illuminated some of those known unknowns and even hinted at unknown unknowns, inspiring us to continue exploring fearlessly. In doing so, we carry forward the only path that endures: the Path of Truth, which, read in any direction, spells out Love and Consciousness prevailing.

Sources:

Etymology of rey (Spanish “king”) from Latin rex[1].
Jewish avoidance of pronouncing YHWH, using Adonai or HaShem[9].
The Trinity in Christianity: one God in three persons (Father, Son, Holy Spirit)[11].
Quranic names of God Al-Raḥmān (The Compassionate) and Al-Raḥīm (The Merciful)[13].
Symmetrical (chiastic) structures found in the Bible and Quran[16].
Boustrophedon writing (alternating directions) in ancient inscriptions[2].
Rig Veda 1.164.46: “Truth is One; the wise call it by many names.”[18].
Hebrew letter Resh meaning “head, beginning”[3] and Yod meaning “hand (of God)”[5].
Revelation 22:13 (Alpha and Omega, First and Last, Beginning and End)[12].