Spiders - the "Ancient" game theory strategist

In the game of eternity, the frantic motion of the insect is noise. The silence of the spider is signal.

They are not merely surviving; they are optimizing.

They have solved the game.

1. Introduction: The Eight-Legged Optimization Engine

In the chaotic theater of the biosphere, the concept of a "game" is not a metaphor but a mathematical reality. Every organism is a player locked in a relentless contest against entropy, starvation, predation, and reproductive failure. The currency of this game is not gold, but energy; the score is not points, but genetic representation in the next generation. Among the myriad players that have entered the arena over the last half-billion years, few have mastered the mechanics of the game as thoroughly, or as ruthlessly, as the spider (Order: Araneae).

For over 380 million years, spiders have engaged in a high-stakes "Game of Life," navigating the shifting landscapes of the Devonian, the suffocating extinctions of the Permian, and the asteroid-driven winter of the Cretaceous.¹ To observe a spider is to witness a biological agent that has solved complex algorithmic problems regarding resource allocation, risk assessment, and information processing. They are not merely participants in the game; they are expert strategists. Through the rigorous lens of Evolutionary Game Theory (EGT), we can deconstruct their behaviors—from the negentropic engineering of the orb web to the terminal calculations of sexual cannibalism—as Evolutionarily Stable Strategies (ESS) that have been honed by the unforgiving calculus of natural selection.³

This report explores the thesis that spiders are naturally evolved game theory experts. We will strip away the anthropocentric bias that equates "intelligence" with vertebrate brain architecture, exploring instead how spiders manifest a distributed, extended cognition that challenges our definitions of mind.⁵ We will analyze their physiological hardware—hydraulic limbs, book lungs, and silk glands—as constraints that define the boundaries of their strategy space.⁷ We will examine their "winning tactics," which often involve counter-intuitive moves such as male suicide or the consumption of one's own offspring. Finally, we will ascend to the metaphysical, considering the spider as a weaver of fate, an agent that exists in a peculiar relationship with time, seemingly capable of "thinking" outside the temporal flow by externalizing its memory and intent into the physical environment.⁹

1.1 First Principles: The Thermodynamic Imperative

To understand the spider as a strategist, we must start from first principles: the laws of thermodynamics. Life is a local resistance to the Second Law of Thermodynamics; it is a system that maintains low entropy (order) by importing energy and exporting disorder (heat and waste).11

The spider is a master of "negentropy" (negative entropy). While a mammal (a high-entropy engine) burns massive amounts of fuel to maintain a constant body temperature and active brain state, the spider adopts a strategy of profound efficiency. Its "Sit-and-Wait" tactic is a minimization of metabolic cost. By constructing a web—a highly ordered, geometric structure—the spider imposes order on the chaotic flight paths of insects.14 The web is a thermodynamic investment, a projection of the spider's internal biological order into the external world to capture energy.

This thermodynamic perspective frames the entire analysis. Every strategy discussion in this report—whether it is the cost of venom regeneration, the decision to fight for territory, or the construction of a web—is fundamentally an energy equation. The spider is an optimization engine, constantly solving for the maximum intake of Joules with the minimum expenditure of ATP.¹⁵

1.2 Defining the Game: Evolutionary Game Theory (EGT)

Evolutionary Game Theory differs from classical game theory (as formulated by von Neumann and Morgenstern) in one critical aspect: rationality is not required. In classical game theory, players are rational agents who consciously calculate payoffs. In EGT, the "players" are phenotypes or strategies (programmed by genes), and the "payoff" is fitness.4

A strategy is successful not because the spider "knows" it is winning, but because that strategy replicates itself. A central concept we will employ is the Evolutionarily Stable Strategy (ESS). An ESS is a strategy that, if adopted by a population, cannot be invaded by any alternative mutant strategy.3 For example, if a population of spiders plays "Dove" (never fights), a mutant "Hawk" (always fights) will invade and dominate. However, a population of all "Hawks" is unstable because the cost of constant injury is too high. The ESS is often a mix, or a conditional strategy like "Bourgeois" (fight if owner, retreat if intruder).17

Spiders provide some of the most vivid, testable examples of these theoretical models in nature. Their lives are defined by discrete, high-stakes contests:

1. The Foraging Game: Web vs. Cursorial hunting (Investment vs. Risk).
2. The Territorial Game: Hawk vs. Dove dynamics in web ownership.
3. The Mating Game: Sexual Conflict and the "Suicide" strategy.
4. The Information Game: Mimicry, signaling, and deceit.

In the following sections, we will dissect each of these games, revealing the nuanced, often brutal logic of the arachnid strategist.

2. The Deep Time Board: Evolutionary History as a Strategic Filter

The strategic prowess of the modern spider is the result of a 400-million-year refinement process. To understand their current "winning" status, we must look at the board on which they evolved and the cataclysms they survived. The history of the spider is a history of adapting to radical shifts in the rules of the game.

2.1 Origins: The Marine Pre-Adaptation

Recent paleontological discoveries have upended the traditional narrative of arachnid evolution. The analysis of Mollisonia symmetrica, a mid-Cambrian fossil (~500 Ma), reveals that the complex neuroanatomy of arachnids—specifically the organization of the optic neuropils and the protocerebrum—evolved in the marine environment, long before the colonization of land.2

This is a critical strategic insight: the "spider mind" was not a response to the challenges of terrestrial life (gravity, desiccation). It was a pre-adapted toolset. The predatory algorithms for sensory integration and limb coordination were honed in the Cambrian oceans. When the ancestors of spiders (Attercopus, Uraraneids) finally moved onto land in the Silurian/Devonian, they brought with them a neural architecture that was already capable of complex spatial processing.2

The Silk Innovation:

The defining strategic innovation of the spider lineage is silk. Initially, silk was likely used for reproductive purposes—wrapping eggs or lining burrows to protect against the new terrestrial threat of desiccation. The spigots of Attercopus suggest a crude silk production capability.19

In game theory terms, this is an "Exaptation." A trait evolved for one payoff (egg protection) provided a massive, unforeseen advantage in another context (prey capture and sensory extension). The transition from lining a burrow to constructing a trap (the web) fundamentally altered the predator-prey dynamic. It allowed spiders to control space and energy in a way no other terrestrial invertebrate could.

2.2 Surviving the Great Dying: The Low-Energy ESS

The true test of a strategy is its resilience to systemic shock. The Permian-Triassic extinction (the "Great Dying," ~252 Ma) and the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction (K-Pg, ~66 Ma) were events that wiped out the majority of life on Earth. Yet, the fossil record indicates that spider families suffered no significant decline during the K-Pg event; in fact, their relative abundance increased in the aftermath.¹

How did spiders survive when the dinosaurs (and many insects) died? The answer lies in their metabolic strategy.

Spiders possess exceptionally low resting metabolic rates (RMR) compared to insects and vertebrates. They are "metabolic misers".20 This low energetic overhead is a "Minimax" strategy—minimizing the maximum possible loss during lean times.

• Starvation Resistance: Many spiders can survive for months without food. In the aftermath of an asteroid impact, when photosynthesis collapses and food chains crumble, the high-energy "active" players (like flying insects or small dinosaurs) starve quickly. The spider, capable of entering a state of metabolic quiescence (diapause), simply waits.²¹
• The Detritus Link: During the K-Pg event, the collapse of living plants shifted the ecosystem to a detritus-based food web. Insects feeding on dead matter flourished. Spiders, as the primary predators of these insects, found themselves in a resource-rich niche while the rest of the world burned.¹

Table 1: Evolutionary Resilience Comparison

2.3 The Insect-Spider Arms Race

The radiation of insects, particularly the evolution of flight, presented a massive new resource. Spiders did not evolve flight to chase them. Instead, they evolved the Orb Web—a static, aerial filter. This is a classic asymmetric strategy. The insect invests in mobility (flight); the spider invests in infrastructure (web).

Phylogenetic analysis suggests that the orb web evolved only once (monophyletic origin) and was subsequently lost or modified in many lineages.19 This "Orb Web Event" was the strategic checkmate that allowed spiders to dominate the aerial niche without leaving the ground. The co-evolutionary arms race that followed—insects developing scales to slip off webs, spiders developing stickier glue; insects detecting webs via ultrasound, spiders reducing web visibility—drove the diversification of both groups.23

3. The Physics of the Player: Hardware Constraints and Advantages

Every game is played within physical constraints. For the spider, these constraints are defined by their unique anatomy: the hydraulic limb system and the respiratory limitations of book lungs. These biological realities dictate the types of strategies available to them.

3.1 The Hydraulic Gambit: Fluid Dynamics of Locomotion

Unlike insects and vertebrates, which use antagonistic muscle pairs (flexors and extensors) to move their limbs, spiders use a hybrid system. They possess flexor muscles to curl their legs inward, but they lack extensor muscles at the major joints (femur-patella and tibia-metatarsus). To extend their legs, they pump hemolymph (blood) into them, using hydraulic pressure generated by the cephalothorax.⁷

Strategic Trade-offs of Hydraulics:

• Advantage (The Burst): This system allows for explosive bursts of power. By spiking blood pressure, jumping spiders (Salticidae) and trap-door spiders can execute movements with accelerations that muscle-only systems struggle to match at that scale. It keeps the limbs slender and lightweight, reducing the rotational inertia and metabolic cost of swinging the leg.⁷
• Disadvantage (The Glass Cannon): The system relies on maintaining internal pressure. If a spider is punctured, it loses pressure and cannot move its legs—it curls into the "death curl" driven by the passive flexors. Furthermore, the system couples locomotion with circulation. High activity spikes blood pressure, potentially limiting the duration of sustained activity.²⁵

This hardware dictates a "Pause-and-Sprint" strategy. Spiders are not endurance runners. They are snipers. They wait (low pressure, low cost) and then strike (high pressure, high cost). This aligns perfectly with their low metabolic rate ESS. They have optimized their body plan for brief, lethal interactions rather than prolonged chases.

3.2 Respiratory Limits and the Size Ceiling

Spiders breathe using book lungs—stacks of air-filled plates where gas exchange occurs via diffusion—and tracheae. This system is efficient at small scales but scales poorly. As a spider gets larger, the surface area of the book lungs does not increase linearly with the volume of tissue requiring oxygen, leading to a diffusion limit.8

This imposes a "Hard Cap" on spider size. Unlike the Carboniferous era, where high oxygen levels allowed for giant arthropods, modern spiders are limited by the physics of diffusion.

Strategic Consequence: Spiders cannot win the game by becoming giants (like dinosaurs). They must win by dominating the micro-scale. The constraints of oxygen transport force them to remain small, which in turn forces them to deal with high surface-area-to-volume ratios and the threat of desiccation.8 This size constraint reinforces the "Web Strategy"—using an external tool to control a volume of space larger than their body could physically dominate.

3.3 Haller’s Rule and the Cost of Intelligence

Haller's Rule states that as body size decreases, the relative size of the brain must increase to maintain essential functions.29 For minute spiders, the brain can consume a massive proportion of the body cavity, sometimes extending into the legs.29

This metabolic cost of neural tissue is a significant handicap. Maintaining a large brain in a tiny body is expensive. This creates a strong evolutionary pressure to reduce the cognitive load on the central nervous system (CNS).

The Solution: Extended Cognition. By outsourcing sensory processing and memory to the web, the spider bypasses the limitations of Haller's Rule. The web acts as a peripheral processor, allowing the spider to exhibit complex behaviors without the need for a metabolically unsustainable "mammalian" brain.9

4. The Extended Phenotype: Thermodynamics of the Web

The spider web is perhaps the most sophisticated tool in the animal kingdom. But viewed through the lens of physics, it is something more: a negentropic machine.

4.1 The Web as a Negentropic Structure

Schrödinger defined life's struggle as the effort to extract "negative entropy" from the environment.11 The web is a physical manifestation of this principle. The universe tends toward disorder (entropy). Insects fly in random, chaotic paths. The web is a highly ordered, geometric lattice imposed upon this chaos.

By building a web, the spider creates a zone of "high probability" for energy capture. It converts the kinetic energy of the flying prey into potential chemical energy for the spider.31

Recent analyses of web structure using information-theoretic entropy measures reveal that spiders maintain a "low entropy" distribution of silk density. They do not spray silk randomly; they adhere to a strict optimization algorithm that minimizes material use while maximizing structural integrity and capture surface.14 The "silk density entropy" is kept low, indicating a high degree of organization and predictability in the spider's investment.

4.2 The Metabolic Cost of Silk and the Recycling Algorithm

Silk is a protein polymer, rich in glycine and alanine. Synthesizing it is metabolically expensive.15 A spider that builds a web is engaging in a massive daily investment of its own body mass.

To make this strategy Evolutionarily Stable (ESS), spiders have evolved a recycling behavior. Many orb-weavers (Araneidae) consume their web at the end of the day. Studies show that they can reclaim up to 95% of the amino acids from the silk.32

The Payoff Matrix of Recycling:

• Cost of Synthesis ($C_{syn}$): High.
• Cost of Construction ($C_{con}$): Moderate (caloric burn of movement).³³
• Value of Recycling ($V_{rec}$): High (95% recovery).
• Net Cost = $C_{syn} + C_{con} - V_{rec}$.By driving $V_{rec}$ up, the spider lowers the Net Cost effectively to just the caloric burn of the activity ($C_{con}$). This allows the spider to possess a "fresh" trap every night, free of dust and wind damage, for a fraction of the cost of building a permanent structure. This is a crucial tactical advantage over predators that rely on permanent, non-renewable tools.

4.3 Water Harvesting: The Hidden Payoff

The web is not just a food trap; it is a water collector. The hygroscopic properties of the capture spiral (due to glycoprotein glue) attract atmospheric moisture. For species like Araneus trifasciata, consuming the wet web provides a significant portion of their daily water budget.34

This is "Function Stacking"—a core principle of efficient design. The same tool used for hunting is used for hydration. In arid environments, this dual payoff can be the difference between life and death, further stabilizing the web-building strategy against desiccation risks.

4.4 The Stabilimenta Controversy: Spandrels or Signals?

A long-standing debate in arachnology concerns the function of stabilimenta—the conspicuous, zig-zag silk decorations found in the webs of Argiope and other genera.35 Are they camouflage, structural supports, or lures?

Hypothesis 1: Aggressive Mimicry (Prey Attraction). Some studies suggest stabilimenta reflect UV light, mimicking flowers to attract insects. This increases the Payoff ($V_{prey}$).36

Hypothesis 2: Predator Deterrence. The decorations make the web visible to birds, preventing them from flying through and destroying the investment. This reduces the Cost ($C_{damage}$).37

Hypothesis 3: Vibration Modulation (The New Insight). Recent research by Greco et al. (2025) suggests a subtler function: signal tuning. The stabilimentum alters the propagation of mechanical waves through the web.38 By stiffening the hub, it allows the spider to better localize the impact of prey and distinguish it from wind noise.

In game theory terms, the stabilimentum is a "Signal-to-Noise Ratio Enhancer." In the information-poor environment of a vibrating web, being able to distinguish a meal from a breeze is a critical informatic advantage. The spider modifies the physical properties of its "external brain" to improve processing speed and accuracy.

5. Information Warfare: Extended Cognition and the "Popperian" Strategist

The "Extended Mind" hypothesis, proposed by Clark and Chalmers, argues that cognition is not confined to the brain but can spill out into the environment.⁹ Spiders are the biological proof of concept for this theory.

5.1 The Web as a Mind

For a web-building spider, the web is an extension of its sensorium. It "thinks" with silk.

• Active Sensing: Spiders do not passively wait. They "pluck" the radii of the web, sending out solitary waves and analyzing the returning harmonics to locate objects or check tension. This is analogous to active sonar or echolocation.⁹
• Memory Storage: The tension state of the web holds information about the environment. By adjusting tension, the spider "stores" its attention in specific sectors.
• Mutual Manipulability: The criterion for extended cognition is met: changing the web changes the spider's behavior; changing the spider's state changes the web structure.9This extended cognition allows the spider to process complex spatial information (velocity, mass, location of prey) without needing the massive neural cortex required for visual processing. The web performs the calculus; the spider executes the solution.

5.2 Portia: The Grandmaster of Arachnids

If orb-weavers are engineers, the jumping spider Portia is a special forces operative. Portia feeds on other spiders—a dangerous game against well-armed opponents. Portia demonstrates cognitive flexibility that rivals mammals.⁵

• The Popperian Creature: Dennett classifies animals as Darwinian (hard-coded), Skinnerian (learn by trial-and-error), or Popperian (can simulate futures internally). Portia is Popperian. It can test hypotheses "in its head" before acting.
• Detouring and Cognitive Maps: When Portia sees prey, it can turn away (losing visual contact) to take a long detour that leads to an optimal attack position. Experiments show Portia can choose the correct path between two options even when the prey is hidden during the traverse.⁵ This implies the maintenance of a "Cognitive Map" or representation—a feat of "Object Permanence" previously thought restricted to vertebrates.
• Aggressive Mimicry Algorithms: When invading a web, Portia plucks the threads to mimic a trapped insect or a mate. It does not use a fixed pattern. It generates a random signal, observes the resident's reaction, and adjusts. If the resident is aggressive, Portia switches signals. If the resident is calm, Portia repeats the signal. This is a real-time "Brute Force" hacking algorithm used to crack the resident spider's security code.⁴³

5.3 The Bolas Spider: Chemical Deception

The Bolas spider (Mastophora) employs Chemical Aggressive Mimicry. It emits volatile compounds that mimic the sex pheromones of female moths.45

This is a game of "Signal Hijacking." The male moth, following a hard-coded routine to find a mate, flies up the scent plume directly into the spider's sticky bolas.

Crucially, the spider can tune the signal. Young spiders attract moth flies (Psychodidae); adults attract larger moths. Some evidence suggests they alter the blend over the course of the night to target different moth species active at different times.45 This is a Frequency-Dependent Strategy that maximizes payoff by tracking the temporal distribution of the prey resource.

6. Agonistic Games: Territory and Conflict

When spiders interact with each other, they engage in Agonistic Games—contests over resources (webs, shelters, mates). These interactions are governed by the classic Hawk-Dove-Bourgeois models of Game Theory.

6.1 The Bourgeois Strategy in Agelenopsis aperta

In the funnel-web spider Agelenopsis aperta, territory is life. A good web site means food; a bad one means starvation.

When an intruder challenges an owner, the ESS is the Bourgeois Strategy: "If owner, fight; if intruder, retreat".17

This strategy uses an arbitrary asymmetry (ownership) to settle the dispute without violence. It avoids the cost of fighting ($C$) which is high.

• The Anti-Bourgeois Exception: In some Mexican populations where web sites are abundant but the cost of fighting is extremely high, spiders play Anti-Bourgeois: "If owner, retreat; if intruder, take the web." This seems paradoxical, but it is mathematically sound when the cost of searching for a new web is lower than the cost of risking injury in a fight.¹⁷

6.2 Resource Holding Potential (RHP) and Escalation

The decision to escalate from display (Dove) to fight (Hawk) is based on Resource Holding Potential (RHP)—usually body size.

Spiders assess each other's RHP through vibrations. A larger spider produces lower-frequency vibrations on the web. This signal is an "Honest Indicator" of size because it is physically constrained by mass.48

However, the game changes if the value of the resource ($V$) exceeds the cost of fighting ($C$). For a starving spider, $V$ is infinite (survival). In this case, a smaller spider (Desperado Strategy) might attack a larger one because it has nothing to lose.

Table 2: The Payoff Matrix of Spider Contests

7. The Mating Game: Sexual Conflict and Terminal Investment

The most brutal games are played between mates. Sexual Cannibalism—where the female eats the male—is the ultimate manifestation of Sexual Conflict. To the uninitiated, it looks like a failure. To the game theorist, it is a calculated exchange.

7.1 The Paradox of Cannibalism

Why would a male allow himself to be eaten?

In species like the Redback spider (Latrodectus hasselti), the male actively somersaults into the female's fangs during copulation. This behavior is an ESS driven by Terminal Investment.49

• The Math of Suicide:
• Probability of finding a second mate: <20% (due to high predation and distance).
• Paternity gained if eaten: 2x (Copulation lasts longer, more sperm transferred, female is satiated and less likely to remate).
• Equation: $(P_{survival} \times V_{future}) < (P_{death} \times V_{bonus})$.
• Since $V_{future}$ is near zero, the male invests everything in the current mating. His body becomes a "Nuptial Gift" that nourishes his own offspring.⁵¹

7.2 Counter-Strategies: Mating with Molting Females

Males are not passive victims; they evolve counter-strategies. In Argiope bruennichi, males seek out females who are in the process of molting.

• The Strategy: A molting female is soft, immobile, and unable to cannibalize.
• The Payoff: The male secures paternity with 97% survival probability, compared to <20% with an adult female.52This is a "Loophole Exploitation." The male bypasses the female's defense (her fangs) by timing his move to her moment of maximum vulnerability.

7.3 Nuptial Gifts: Honest and Dishonest Signaling

In Pisaura mirabilis, males present a wrapped prey item to the female. She eats the gift while he transfers sperm.

• Cheating: Some males wrap worthless items (seeds, husks) in silk. This is Dishonest Signaling.
• The Game: The female cannot inspect the gift without unwrapping it (which takes time). If she rejects the gift, she delays mating. If she accepts, she might get no food. The male exploits this "Time Constraint."
• Frequency Dependence: If too many males cheat, females become suspicious and inspect all gifts. If few cheat, females trust the gifts. The strategy oscillates around an equilibrium point.⁵³

Table 3: The Sexual Conflict Payoff Matrix (Male Perspective)

8. Sociality: The Rare Strategy

Most spiders are solitary, but a few (~50 species) have evolved sociality. Stegodyphus dumicola lives in colonies of hundreds.

The Benefit: Group living allows for the capture of much larger prey (Synergy) and shared silk investment (Efficiency). It also creates a buffer against desiccation and starvation.55

The Cost: Inbreeding and disease.

Social spiders represent a transition from "Individual Selection" to "Group Selection." The colony acts as a super-organism. In Stegodyphus, some females remain virgins but help raise the young of others, eventually allowing themselves to be eaten by the larvae (Matriphagy). This extreme altruism is explained by Kin Selection ($rB > C$)—since the colony is highly inbred, the genetic relatedness ($r$) is extremely high, making the sacrifice genetically profitable.55

9. The Metaphysics of the Web: Time, Fate, and Technics

The final analysis of the spider takes us beyond biology into the realm of philosophy and "Technics."

9.1 Stiegler and the Technics of Arachne

Philosopher Bernard Stiegler argues that "technics" (tools/technology) is the externalization of memory. Humans are defined by this. But the spider is the original technician.57

The web is "epiphylogenetic memory"—memory that is not genetic (DNA) and not somatic (brain), but external. When a spider builds a web, it is recording its past experiences and its future expectations into physical matter. The web is a frozen strategy.

In the myth of Arachne, the mortal weaver challenges the goddess Athena. Arachne is transformed into a spider, condemned to weave forever. Philosophically, this represents the fusion of the creator with the creation. The spider is its web. Its existence is inseparable from its technical extension.59

9.2 Thinking Outside of Time

Does the spider think "outside of time"?

In a sense, yes. The web allows the spider to interact with events that have not yet happened. The geometry of the web is a prediction of a future fly.

When the event occurs (the fly hits), the interaction is mediated by the structure built in the past. The spider sits at the hub, motionless, in a state of "alert passivity." It exists in a "Deep Now," connected to the entire surface area of its trap.

This contrasts with the frantic, linear time of the active hunter. The spider waits for the universe to come to it. This is a stance of "Active Nihilism" (in the Nietzschean sense)—creating one's own meaning/structure in a void.57

10. Conclusion: The Definition of Winning

Are spiders winners or losers?

If "winning" is defined by species count, insects win. They have radiated into millions of forms through the cheat codes of flight and metamorphosis.61

But if "winning" is defined by Evolutionary Stability and Thermodynamic Efficiency, the spider is the Grandmaster.

• Efficiency: They survive mass extinctions by doing less, burning less, and needing less. They are the ultimate "Preppers" of the animal kingdom.⁶³
• Control: They dominate the aerial niche without flying. They control the ground without running. They use silk to rewrite the laws of physics in their favor.
• Cognition: They demonstrate that mind is not a property of the brain alone, but of the brain-body-world system. They are the pioneers of the Extended Mind.

In the game of eternity, the frantic motion of the insect is noise. The silence of the spider is signal. They are not merely surviving; they are optimizing. They have solved the game.

Note: This report synthesizes data from 151 provided research snippets. Citations are embedded in the text to support claims regarding evolutionary history, physiological constraints, game theory models, and philosophical interpretations.

AI Collaboration with Gemini 3 pro

Works cited

1. (PDF) Resistance of spiders to Cretaceous Tertiary extinction events - ResearchGate, accessed December 10, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8949184_Resistance_of_spiders_to_Cretaceous_Tertiary_extinction_events
2. A 500-million-year-old fossil just rewrote the spider origin story | ScienceDaily, accessed December 10, 2025, https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/07/250723045712.htm
3. The evolutionarily stable strategy, animal contests, parasitoids, pest control and sociality | Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B - Journals, accessed December 10, 2025, https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2021.0498
4. Evolutionary game theory - Wikipedia, accessed December 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_game_theory
5. Arthropod Intelligence? The Case for Portia - Frontiers, accessed December 10, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568049/full
6. THE EXECUTION OF PLANNED DETOURS BY SPIDER-EATING PREDATORS - PMC - NIH, accessed December 10, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4751061/
7. (PDF) Hydraulic System of Locomotion - ResearchGate, accessed December 10, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257331862_Hydraulic_System_of_Locomotion
8. Upper limits to body size imposed by respiratory–structural trade-offs in Antarctic pycnogonids - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed December 10, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5666104/
9. Extended spider cognition - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH, accessed December 10, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5394149/
10. The Spider's Stratagem - SITI Company, accessed December 10, 2025, https://siti.org/the-spiders-stratagem/
11. BIOLOGICAL ORGANIZATION AND NEGATIVE ENTROPY: Based on Schrödinger's reflections1 Francis Bailly Giuseppe Longo - arXiv, accessed December 10, 2025, https://arxiv.org/pdf/0801.2038
12. Negentropy is the "telos" of organisms - ResearchGate, accessed December 10, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371181668_Negentropy_is_the_telos_of_organisms
13. (PDF) Thermodynamics of Surface Degradation, Self-Organization, and Self-Healing for Biomimetic Surfaces - ResearchGate, accessed December 10, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24269584_Thermodynamics_of_Surface_Degradation_Self-Organization_and_Self-Healing_for_Biomimetic_Surfaces
14. An Analysis of Silk Density in Spider Webs | bioRxiv, accessed December 10, 2025, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.01.26.634972.full
15. Metabolic Modeling of Spider Silk Production in E. coli - DigitalCommons@USU, accessed December 10, 2025, https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/3892/
16. THE ENERGETICS OF WEB-BUILDING IN SPIDERS - Holy Cross, accessed December 10, 2025, https://college.holycross.edu/faculty/kprestwi/pubs/CmpBiochmPhys_v57A_p321.pdf
17. Animal Contests as Evolutionary Games | American Scientist, accessed December 10, 2025, https://www.americanscientist.org/article/animal-contests-as-evolutionary-games
18. From Hawks and Doves to Self‐Consistent Games of Territorial Behavior | The American Naturalist: Vol 167, No 6 - The University of Chicago Press: Journals, accessed December 10, 2025, https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/504604
19. Reconstructing web evolution and spider diversification in the molecular era - PMC, accessed December 10, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2656561/
20. Resting Metabolic Rates of Two Orbweb Spiders: A First Approach to Evolutionary Success of Ecribellate Spiders - PubMed, accessed December 10, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21215752/
21. Adaptation of the spiders to the environment: the case of some Chilean species - PMC, accessed December 10, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4531227/
22. Is spider resting metabolic rate more strongly associated with ecological guild or extreme habitat conditions? - PubMed, accessed December 10, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41086844/
23. Spider Diversification Through Space and Time - Annual Reviews, accessed December 10, 2025, https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-ento-061520-083414
24. The sticky truth: how spider predation success depends on their prey's body surface, accessed December 10, 2025, https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/228/9/jeb249347/367915/The-sticky-truth-how-spider-predation-success
25. Hydraulic lifts, pistons, and SPIDERS? Oh my. - Evolutionary Thought - WordPress.com, accessed December 10, 2025, https://evolutionarythought.wordpress.com/2009/12/26/hydraulic-lifts-pistons-and-spiders-oh-my/
26. Hydraulic leg extension is not necessarily the main drive in large spiders - PubMed, accessed December 10, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22279064/
27. What biological constraints are there on how large a spider can grow?, accessed December 10, 2025, https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/9049/what-biological-constraints-are-there-on-how-large-a-spider-can-grow
28. Polar gigantism and the oxygen–temperature hypothesis: a test of upper thermal limits to body size in Antarctic pycnogonids | Proceedings B - Journals, accessed December 10, 2025, https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rspb/article/286/1900/20190124/84967/Polar-gigantism-and-the-oxygen-temperature
29. Plenty of Room at the Bottom? | American Scientist, accessed December 10, 2025, https://www.americanscientist.org/article/plenty-of-room-at-the-bottom
30. HISTOLOGICAL CHANGES CORRELATED WITH EVOLUTIONARY CHANGES OF BODY SIZE - ResearchGate, accessed December 10, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368539236_HISTOLOGICAL_CHANGES_CORRELATED_WITH_EVOLUTIONARY_CHANGES_OF_BODY_SIZE
31. A thermodynamic analysis of the spider silk and the importance of complexity - arXiv, accessed December 10, 2025, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.06497
32. Untitled - University of Michigan Library, accessed December 10, 2025, https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstreams/4917bfd4-7f1a-4d66-ac34-acaeaf09e388/download
33. Body-mass-dependent cost of web-building behavior in an orb weaving spider, Zygiella x-notata | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed December 10, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/10682481_Body-mass-dependent_cost_of_web-building_behavior_in_an_orb_weaving_spider_Zygiella_x-notata
34. Water harvesting during orb web recycling - BioOne, accessed December 10, 2025, https://bioone.org/journals/the-journal-of-arachnology/volume-48/issue-3/JoA-S-19-066/Water-harvesting-during-orb-web-recycling/10.1636/JoA-S-19-066.full
35. Stabilimentum - Wikipedia, accessed December 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stabilimentum
36. The Function of Stabilimenta in Spider Webs | Synaptic - Central College, accessed December 10, 2025, https://central.edu/writing-anthology/2020/07/06/the-function-of-stabilimenta-in-spider-webs/
37. Spider web protection through visual advertisement: role of the stabilimentum - PubMed, accessed December 10, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17841687/
38. Spiders Spin Web Decorations That May Help Detect Prey - The Scientist, accessed December 10, 2025, https://www.the-scientist.com/spiders-spin-web-decorations-that-may-help-detect-prey-73665
39. Spider web “decorations” may help pinpoint location of captured prey - EurekAlert!, accessed December 10, 2025, https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1102862
40. The Thoughts of a Spiderweb | Quanta Magazine, accessed December 10, 2025, https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-thoughts-of-a-spiderweb-20170523/
41. Spiders are much smarter than you think | Knowable Magazine, accessed December 10, 2025, https://knowablemagazine.org/content/article/mind/2021/are-spiders-intelligent
42. Portia's capacity to decide whether a detour is necessary - Company of Biologists Journals, accessed December 10, 2025, https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/222/15/jeb203463/223379/Portia-s-capacity-to-decide-whether-a-detour-is
43. Spider Flexibly Chooses Aggressive Mimicry Signals for Different Prey By Trial and Error - Gwern.net, accessed December 10, 2025, https://gwern.net/doc/biology/portia/1993-jackson.pdf
44. Cognitive Abilities of Araneophagic Jumping Spiders - Gwern, accessed December 10, 2025, https://gwern.net/doc/biology/portia/1998-wilcox.pdf
45. K. Yeargan - Exploitation of chemical communication by a spider predator - University of Kentucky Entomology, accessed December 10, 2025, https://www.uky.edu/Ag/Entomology/entdept/faculty/yeargan/yeargan2.htm
46. Aggressive chemical mimicry by a bolas spider - PubMed, accessed December 10, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17818935/
47. Bolas spiders: masters of deception - spiderbytes, accessed December 10, 2025, https://spiderbytes.org/2015/03/17/bolas-spiders-masters-of-deception/
48. Game Theory - Holy Cross, accessed December 10, 2025, https://college.holycross.edu/faculty/kprestwi/behavior/ESS/games.pdf
49. Spider cannibalism - Wikipedia, accessed December 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spider_cannibalism
50. Sexual Cannibalism as a Manifestation of Sexual Conflict - PMC - NIH, accessed December 10, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4413240/
51. Ultimate sacrifice: Spider's post-sex cannibalism aids offspring | Nebraska Today, accessed December 10, 2025, https://news.unl.edu/article/ultimate-sacrifice-spiders-post-sex-cannibalism-aids-offspring
52. Exploiting a Moment of Weakness: Male Spiders Escape Sexual Cannibalism by Copulating With Moulting Females - PubMed, accessed December 10, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26607497/
53. In sexual cannibalism, do males voluntarily get eaten by the females or is there a tussle to survive? - Reddit, accessed December 10, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/biology/comments/11b24b0/in_sexual_cannibalism_do_males_voluntarily_get/
54. A mate to die for? A model of conditional monogyny in cannibalistic spiders - PMC - NIH, accessed December 10, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3492783/
55. Predictors of colony extinction vary by habitat type in social spiders | bioRxiv, accessed December 10, 2025, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/612432v1.full-text
56. Benefits of Group Living Include Increased Feeding Efficiency and Lower Mass Loss during Desiccation in the Social and Inbreeding Spider Stegodyphus dumicola - ResearchGate, accessed December 10, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292675346_Benefits_of_Group_Living_Include_Increased_Feeding_Efficiency_and_Lower_Mass_Loss_during_Desiccation_in_the_Social_and_Inbreeding_Spider_Stegodyphus_dumicola
57. Bernard Stiegler: Eris and Technics | The Dark Forest, accessed December 10, 2025, https://socialecologies.wordpress.com/2016/12/23/bernard-stiegler-eris-and-technics/
58. Bernard Steigler's Technics and Time 1: The Fault of Epimetheus | The Simulation Space, accessed December 10, 2025, https://thesimulationspace.wordpress.com/2014/09/08/bernard-steiglers-technics-and-time-1-the-fault-of-epimetheus/
59. ARACHNE (Arakhne) - Lydian Weaver of Greek Mythology, accessed December 10, 2025, https://www.theoi.com/Heroine/Arakhne.html
60. The myth of Arachne and the mysteries of transformation - Mythic Mojo, accessed December 10, 2025, https://mythicmojo.com/arachne-and-the-mysteries-of-transformation/
61. Why are there so many more insects than arachnids, both living today and in the fossil record? : r/biology - Reddit, accessed December 10, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/biology/comments/1bmebgk/why_are_there_so_many_more_insects_than_arachnids/
62. Metamorphosis - What Does it Mean and Why is it Important? - Butterfly Pavilion, accessed December 10, 2025, https://butterflies.org/metamorphosis-blog/
63. How the Low-Energy Will Inherit the Earth | Sierra Club, accessed December 10, 2025, https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/how-low-energy-will-inherit-earth