Define probabilities relative to an observer? Non-Markovian processes, where the future depends on the entire past, not just the current state? Connection to Non-Ergodicity? Case Example: In fluctuating space-time, the ground truth of probability dissolves.
Reality is a user-friendly fiction, symbols our minds use to navigate an inscrutable reality. Extending this idea to a "Primordial Consciousness", reality might become from a living network of conscious agents that are all one being, in a complex interaction that enables experiences, and life.
Does the paradox vindicate an ontology where reality is perspectival (varying with the observer’s viewpoint) rather than absolute? These paradoxes may reveal that what we take to be "objective reality" is better modeled as an observer-centric construction.
Large Language Models (LLMs) have rapidly advanced to exhibit behaviors that challenge the notion they are merely next-word prediction engines. What are these minds? This will be an honest and rigorous journey into known and unknown aspects of our collective being.
Mythological, historical, psychological, and symbolic roots across cultures and time. Mesopotamian precursors, Jewish and Gnostic interpretations, modern philosophical and psychological readings (e.g. Jung, feminist theology). Character motivations and metaphysical frameworks.
Conceptual and ontological relationship between causality and time. The origin of change in Physics (relativity, quantum gravity, thermodynamics), metaphysics (temporal ontology, process philosophy), and cosmology (pre-time origins, first causes).
Is cause-and-effect a fundamental feature of the world or merely a convenient heuristic? Is The only question that can be asked in physics "What fraction of states satisfying condition A also satisfy condition B", a conditional probability? or a "Giant" differential equation?
It took me 5 years to complete my PhD thesis. I can do a better job in a month, with AI. Advances in artificial intelligence are brutal and unstoppable. Whats next?
How morphogenesis works? Uncover known mechanisms, current hypotheses, and speculative frontiers — weaving together genetics, epigenetics, bioelectricity, cellular cognition, and developmental teleology into a unified narrative.
Truth and deception are often seen as opposites, but throughout history they have been forces driving evolution, society, and knowledge. Truth and its relationship to Lies and Deception from the dawn of life on Earth to the emerging era of artificial intelligence.
Why complexity in the universe appears to increase over time: How irreversible process drives creation.
The three dimensions we explored – anisogamy (egg/sperm dichotomy), the Y chromosome, and maternal mitochondria – all illustrate a common theme: division of roles and specialization. By splitting reproductive contributions between two sexes in unequal ways, evolution opened up new adaptive pathways.
Historic Events as Game Outcomes, shaped by whether we see the world as zero-sum (one gains is another’s loss) or non-zero-sum (cooperation and mutual gains). From empires, colonization and capitalism, to today’s chaotic state. Finally, how AI might shift these dynamics.
Paul Erdős famously remarked, “Mathematics may not be ready for such problems.” We are exploring its mathematical structure, historical and computational efforts, theoretical barriers, and connections to other domains like dynamical systems and computability theory.
Exploring the Demise of Spacetime: Insights from Quantum Gravity, Holography, Post-Spacetime Models, and Foundational Philosophy—What’s Our Role as Observers?
This journey will cross neuroscience, philosophy of mind, quantum theory, and religious and spiritual traditions. Let's dive into what we know, what remains speculative, and what might be unknowable.