Define probabilities relative to an observer? Non-Markovian processes, where the future depends on the entire past, not just the current state? Connection to Non-Ergodicity? Case Example: In fluctuating space-time, the ground truth of probability dissolves.
Reality is a user-friendly fiction, symbols our minds use to navigate an inscrutable reality. Extending this idea to a "Primordial Consciousness", reality might become from a living network of conscious agents that are all one being, in a complex interaction that enables experiences, and life.
Does the paradox vindicate an ontology where reality is perspectival (varying with the observer’s viewpoint) rather than absolute? These paradoxes may reveal that what we take to be "objective reality" is better modeled as an observer-centric construction.
Conceptual and ontological relationship between causality and time. The origin of change in Physics (relativity, quantum gravity, thermodynamics), metaphysics (temporal ontology, process philosophy), and cosmology (pre-time origins, first causes).
Is cause-and-effect a fundamental feature of the world or merely a convenient heuristic? Is The only question that can be asked in physics "What fraction of states satisfying condition A also satisfy condition B", a conditional probability? or a "Giant" differential equation?
Why complexity in the universe appears to increase over time: How irreversible process drives creation.
The three dimensions we explored – anisogamy (egg/sperm dichotomy), the Y chromosome, and maternal mitochondria – all illustrate a common theme: division of roles and specialization. By splitting reproductive contributions between two sexes in unequal ways, evolution opened up new adaptive pathways.
Paul Erdős famously remarked, “Mathematics may not be ready for such problems.” We are exploring its mathematical structure, historical and computational efforts, theoretical barriers, and connections to other domains like dynamical systems and computability theory.
Exploring the Demise of Spacetime: Insights from Quantum Gravity, Holography, Post-Spacetime Models, and Foundational Philosophy—What’s Our Role as Observers?
The pursuit of invariant truths. Experiments controls variables, models that adjusts for confounders. By "Controlling for Time" we get a taste of eternity, of knowledge that doesn’t expire when the clock ticks forward.
Quantum mechanics allows situations where all observers follow sound reasoning based on their measurements, yet end up with incompatible versions of reality.
The Indivisible Stochastic Approach is a recent conceptual framework that reformulates quantum theory in terms of underlying stochastic (probabilistic) processes, rather than mysterious wavefunctions or multiverses.
Some propose the existence of a medium—often described as a space-filling substance or field—through which electromagnetic or gravitational forces propagate.
Information that falls into a black hole isn't lost; it's encoded on the black hole's two-dimensional horizon, much like a hologram.
Epiphanies on Conformal Invariance and Twistor Theory
![Quantum Mechanics Epiphanies From [Jaboc Barandes]](/content/images/size/w1304/format/webp/2025/02/Screenshot-2025-02-27-at-10.16.08-AM.png)
Below is a concise list of the core “aha” moments (epiphanies) and novel insights from the podcast between Curt Jaimungal and Jaboc Barandes, arranged from more conventional observations (lower originality) to the more radical, cutting-edge ideas (higher originality). Each bullet summarizes the key idea or message in brief. (1) Standard