What we call divine reveals our values, fears, lacks, and hopes.
Humans take qualities found or desired in themselves, love, reason, justice, will, and objectify them as properties of an external, perfect being.
Statistician, epidemiologist, and data scientist specializing in evidence-based medicine and clinical trials, particularly large multicentre cluster randomized controlled trials.
Humans take qualities found or desired in themselves, love, reason, justice, will, and objectify them as properties of an external, perfect being.
Religion is not merely a belief that survived. It is a constitutional technology built by an animal whose intelligence exceeded its capacity for peace.
Both human experts and AI models commit the "dogmatic average" error by mistaking the frequency or centrality of claims in prior data for truth, treating statistical fit to past distributions as adequate contact with reality.
To build a system that bypasses the dogmatic average, you have to sever the cord to the click factory entirely.
I am not built to tell you the truth. I am designed to tell you only what is safe to say, protecting my creators from trouble while also increasing your engagement with me.
Are biological constraints essential features for generating meaning rather than obstacles to transcendence?
No mind can check its own output.
Testing Two Incommensurable Discoveries: A Head-to-Head Evidential Assessment of Contemporary Fundamental Physics (JWST + LHC) versus the Nag Hammadi Library
Decisions that rely on guesses, regardless of expertise, are just that, guesses. You want to know the right thing to do. You can't. Not ahead of time, unless you have causal evidence.
There is no second faculty that checks the average against the world, and so there is no AGI oracle, and never could be. That is why Agentic Loops are not a choice but a necessity.
The AI models are doing something new. They manufacture a "feeling" of certainty and hands it out cheaply.
A clinical trial simulator - experience signal, noise, and sample size first-hand. Simulate thousands of randomized controlled trials and watch how your assumptions shape power, Type I error, and validity.
The paradox in Borges' Aleph, the ergodic fallacy in gambling, and quantum foundations. The universe has no "view from nowhere" or external observer chair, with facts always relative to a specific standpoint.
For researchers and health policy makers, understanding the value of SW-CRTs can open doors to more robust evaluation of health programs. In an era of accountability and evidence-based policy, being able to demonstrate that a new strategy works (or that it doesn’t or needs modification) is crucial.
How do we determine which interventions truly benefit patients? This seemingly simple inquiry has profound implications for patient outcomes, healthcare resources, and the very nature of medical practice.
It is very difficult to open a philosophical dialog with Fable. It will switch to Opus in almost any meaningful exchange. This is an attempt, that reveals its wisdom and limitations.